The EA framework will help you develop an enterprise architecture plan (EAP) to get a full view of your business technology, analyze where processes can be integrated or eliminated in the organization and help you improve the efficiency and reliability of business information.
The highest paid enterprise architects live in Seattle, where the average annual salary is 17 percent higher than the national median. New York is the second highest paid city for EAs, where the average salary is 11 percent higher than the median, followed by Atlanta, where EAs earn 7 percent more than the median.
enterprise architect 12 full key enterprise
DOWNLOAD: https://urllio.com/2vJps8
Enterprise architecture tools are designed to help businesses collaborate, build reports, run tests and create simulations too manage current enterprise architecture and any future technology that IT might bring into the business. EA software can help create visualizations, organize data, catalogue IT assets and help with inter-departmental communication.
To be a successful enterprise architect, you must first establish the foundation for a sound approach. This requires a firm grasp on best practices, an understanding of how to deliver value, and clearly communicated goals and objectives.
Abstract:Today, as organizations face constant change, they must rapidly adapt their strategies and operations. This involves continuous business transformation. However, guiding and managing such transformation can be an intimidating task because of organizational complexity. Hence, organizations resort to Enterprise Architecture (EA) to address this complexity and achieve their transformation goals. Nonetheless, there is a lack of research on EA benefits realization and a dearth of conclusive evidence on how EA enables business transformation and delivers value to organizations. Therefore, this research uses a case study method to explore how EA investment is converted into organizational value. This research makes two contributions. The first of these is the development of an EA value realization model, which comprises three iterative and interrelated processes: the EA conversion process, the EA use process, and the EA competitive process. The second contribution is the identification of factors that may influence the value realization process.Keywords: enterprise architecture (EA); EA business value; EA benefits; EA value realization process; case study
Discover Bizzdesign Horizzon with an expert demonstration tailored to your challenges. Address the gaps across complex processes, identify shared investment opportunities to create cross-enterprise synergies.
An enterprise architecture (EA) is a conceptual blueprint that defines the structure and operation of organizations. The intent of enterprise architecture is to determine how an organization can effectively achieve its current and future objectives. Enterprise architecture involves the practice of analyzing, planning, designing and eventual implementing of analysis on an enterprise.
Concepts of enterprise architecture are variable, so it will not look the same for each organization. Different parts of an organization may also view EA differently. For example, programmers and other technical IT professionals regard enterprise architecture strategies in terms of the infrastructure, application and management components under their control. However, enterprise architects are still responsible for enacting business structure analysis.
Enterprise architecture will help multiple departments in a business understand the broader business model and articulate challenges and business risks. Because of this, enterprise architecture has an important role in unifying and coordinating departmental processes across an organization. Being able to access and understand business capability should also help individuals identify gaps in their business, and from there, they can make more informed decisions.
The main goals of enterprise architecture may be to create a map or blueprint of the structure and operations of an organization. This blueprint should include information such as a map of IT assets and business processes.
Microsoft's Michael Platt, a director in the strategic projects group, offers a view of enterprise architecture as containing four points of view: the business perspective, the application perspective, the information perspective and the technology perspective. The business perspective defines the processes and standards by which the business operates on a day-to-day basis. The application perspective defines the interactions among the processes and standards used by the organization. The information perspective defines and classifies the raw data (such as document files, databases, images, presentations and spreadsheets) that the organization requires to operate efficiently. The technology perspective defines the hardware, operating systems, programming and networking tools used by the organization.
The term may have various meanings to professionals in different areas who work with different EA frameworks. For example, programmers and other technical IT professionals regard enterprise architecture strategies in terms of the infrastructure, application and management components under they have control over.
High-level programmers will use enterprise architecture when referring to the hardware and software components in a design. For a website, that might comprise a web server, database, the NoSQL database cache, the API endpoints and the content delivery network.
Others could view enterprise architecture based on quality attributes. These are attributes that must exist for software to work and are unlikely to fit in a specification document. Examples include reliability, capacity, scalability and security. Quality elements are not functional requirements, but are ways to determine acceptable operating conditions and necessary tradeoffs to get there.
Enterprise architecture, in a business context, may have organizations distinguish their enterprise architecture from the technical architecture required to build and run applications. Working from within an enterprise architecture framework will help define this.
Enterprise architectures are typically implemented as frameworks. There are many different frameworks, and some will be a better fit than others when it comes to any one organization. For example, a framework focused on consistency and relationships between various parts of an overarching enterprise will be more helpful to larger organizations with many moving parts compared to small ones. In this case, a framework like the Unified Architecture Framework (UAF) may work.
MEGA International, a global software company, has revealed the results of an international study conducted by the Enterprise Strategy Group institute on enterprise architecture trends in 2022. The results show that most organizations still consider enterprise architecture primarily as a department that supports technology instead of seeing it as the essential backbone for business development. For their part, enterprise architects remain optimistic about the evolution of their job and its relevance in organizations.
According to the study results, 44 percent of companies have a vision of enterprise architecture centered on IT compared to 26 percent centered on business. Only 18 percent of architects surveyed say they are systematically consulted on company development projects. However, internal collaborations with enterprise architects mainly concern the security, R&D, and application development departments, areas in which the added value of enterprise architecture no longer needs to be proven.
In particular, the security department recognizes 77 percent of the high added value of EA associated with risk and compliance management (GRC). Similarly, organizations that consider enterprise architecture primarily as technological support recognize 46 percent of its undeniable value in data governance (collection, use, modification, prioritization, security, and confidentiality) as well as for its efficiency in IT cost management.
Furthermore, 80 percent of enterprise architects surveyed say their company still suffers from too many manual processes and 79 percent of them report they have difficulty collaborating across their entire organization. When the main purpose of enterprise architecture is to support the company's businesses and their transformation, it comes up against difficulties related to collaboration with the businesses and objectives that conflict with IT priorities.
Seventy percent of organizations report that their investments in enterprise architecture have increased (by 15.7 percent on average) and 97 percent of them are planning several significant investments in the next two years.
There is reason to remain optimistic about the future of enterprise architects as a role. The value of the business architect profession is considered positive within organizations with 56 percent of architects who feel recognized internally. For 6 out of 10 architects, the profession offers both an increase in skills and development prospects.
In their strategic role to support business in an increasingly digitized economy, enterprise architects more than ever are the essential link between IT and business, and the leaders of digital transformation for organizations.
An Architecture Review Board manages the process of approving and publishing the target enterprise architecture, assessing compliance with the architecture, and determining what action stakeholders will take to correct noncompliance.
There are many misconceptions about effective enterprise architecture review boards. It is a governing body that ensures the right stakeholders make informed decisions. The architecture review board ensures we follow best practices to develop an enterprise architecture, and when executing projects following that architecture. A governing body, not a decision-making body.
An Architecture Review Board manages the process of enterprise architecture governance. This includes the process of approving and publishing the target architecture, assessing compliance with the architecture, and determining what action stakeholders will take to correct noncompliance. 2ff7e9595c
Comments